I was just examining "Panty John's" pix, and it's great to see the results of others that custom-craft their own pretties, when the standard design's not enough for their desires and needs.
From what I observe, it looks like "Pee-Jay" might use a similar design principle that I use, for my custom-crafteds. He may like his playwares considerably more scimpy than do I, but, his designs look to bee very similar to mine, in that the Front Panels and Back Panels have identical coverage and symmetry to each other, and for that reason, among many, concerning our designs, you really don't need to worry whether you're wearing these "forwards" or "backwards", as they're gonna tickle your "fancy" 'n' bum, just the same.
Pee-Jay? Keep it up, in more ways than one!
-- Edited by Breeziestroke on Thursday 9th of June 2011 12:54:28 PM
Wearing them forwards or backwards might be difficult for some folks...but not me. My winkey is so small that it wouldn't matter which way i wear them.
Wearing them forwards or backwards might be difficult for some folks...but not me. My winkey is so small that it wouldn't matter which way i wear them.
For Buddy and the Rest of You:
When I do change Grannie Briefs, and selected soft TW's, the visual impact is much like high-waisted Boyleg Briefs, or, short-legged Pettiepanties.
If I were commisioned to handsew some for any of you--though some like Pee-Jay would prefer bikinis and hipsters--you could be sure that I'd give you bonus stretch of the leg elastic, just to be sure. If they are too tight, when you sit down, the elastics are going to cut into your front upper thighs, in a most annoying way, and cause chafeing, too. And the tighter they are, the more time spent, you're constantly jiggling those elastics, to get the right tactile/visual effects. That's why you need a bonus stretch to lead towards the hips, as you sit down, or bend way forward.
Next, I'd assure a nice--snug, not tight--waist, so that the fabric would most definitely positively caress your tummies and abdomens, and the small of your backs, leading into the mid-swell of your bums and hips.
The gusset would be the same, "front" or "back", and I wouldn't make it too long, as the horizontal arching mushroom seam might annoy your winkies, even with interior sewing of those seams. For my sizing, that's no more than 9", from mushroom arch apex to the other mushroom arch apex, and plenty wide, so there's a roomy pocket for Sam 'n' Dave, through your groins, through your crotches, leading through that sensitive area to the under-cheeks of your bums. I for one, prefer a single layer, though most of you are used to the idea of the double layer, with one layer having more area, so that that looser layer might "rub you the right way"!
I believe that my design principle ensures not only Winkie's maximum stimulation, but all of those zones of your bods that pay sensory, sensual tribute to Winkie. Just move about in my designs, and you'll see . . . AND FEEL!! For you big-winkied fellows, there's no way he, and Sam 'n' Dave are gonna peek out the sides; with nice fabric, why should they? When aroused, then the "surplus" fabric cums into strategic play, to better clasp Winkie and vicinity, with that all-caressing fabric, effectively keeping reasonable caress of the fabric, of those other errogenous zones.
And it makes not a whit o' difference, whether you wear 'em "forwards" or "backwards"; the effect remains the same, no matter what! Additionally, I prefer wearing 'em "inside-out", as the finer vertically-oriented knit-grain furrows and ridges of Tricots, is way softer than the "inner" horizontally-grained surface.
I'd sure like to see the bio-ladies of you out there, wearing my designs; the rippling of the fabric across your contours, would be most tantalizing as you move about! I do however realize that there is the "utility issue", as the conventional pantie design of the front legs and front gusset does allow for a great measure of personal and private security, for those once-a-month times. Ladies? On that point, I would intend my designs, if they were to be worn by you, to be mainly for your private playtimes, or, your playtimes with your SO's. The conventionally designed regular everyday panties that you normally wear, would be for your utility-based personal and private security and hygiene, for most of the day's hours--do wear those--until ya wanna play!! "Strictly" for playtimes. I guarantee that you would look cute (As well as hopefully feeling cute?) in my designs.
I prefer extreme high-waists--or more--as all of my skin positively responds sensually, to all of that gushy-luscious, and gushy-liscious fabric--I just do not want it to ever leave me alone!!
Say Pee-Jay, in the pix of you wearing the Lime-Banded Briefs, what is that fabric? It looks similar to the ultra-fine, ultra-sheer Microfibre Lycra used in Bali Skimp-Scamps. I like you best in those!!