Panties For Men

*If any other of our presidents joined the

country of Mexico and sued a state in

the United States to force that state

to continue to allow illegal immigration,

would you question his patriotism

and wonder whose side he was on? *  *If any other of our presidents joined the

country of Mexico and sued a state in

the United States to force that state

to continue to allow illegal immigration,

would you question his patriotism

and wonder whose side he was on? **If any other of our presidents joined the

country of Mexico and sued a state in

the United States to force that state

to continue to allow illegal immigration,

would you question his patriotism

and wonder whose side he was on? *   *If any other of our presidents joined the

country of Mexico and sued a state in

the United States to force that state

to continue to allow illegal immigration,

would you question his patriotism

and wonder whose side he was on? * 

 

 

 

No, Barry, you're not gonna be re-elected. And when you do move back to Big Windy, I'm not entirely sure that you can still worship in Rev. Wright's church, since you threw him under the bus!! Perhaps you can help Sharpton & Jackson, Sr. set up a new church, and worship there.

-- Edited by Breeziestroke on Thursday 25th of October 2012 03:36:43 PM

Breeziestroke wrote:

---

No, Barry, you're not gonna be re-elected. And when you do move back to Big Windy, I'm not entirely sure that you can still worship in Rev. Wright's church, since you threw him under the bus!! Perhaps you can help Sharpton & Jackson, Sr. set up a new church, and worship there.

-- Edited by Breeziestroke on Thursday 25th of October 2012 03:36:43 PM

---

 I wonder what the church would be called? Anton Lavay already has the name Church of Satan. Maybe Lucifer's Three.

*If any other of our presidents had been the

first President to need a Teleprompter

installed to be able to get through

a press conference, would you have

laughed and said this is more proof of how inept

he is on his own and is really controlled

by smarter men

behind the scenes? *

*If any other of our presidents had reduced

your retirement plan holdings

of GM stock by 90% and given the

unions a majority stake in GM,

would you have approved? *

Breeziestroke wrote:

---

In the State of Oregon, except for Nixon/McGovern '72, I believe that no Republican has done much better, Pre-Election Polling and Final Election Results combined, since Eisenhower, than 38%. Now Mitt's closed in on Barry, to within 5 points or less. Hmm??? And Oregon's about as hippie as California, Washington (both State & D.C.), Minnesota, New York, and Massachusetts.

---

 The Obamanation is running scared. He is a desperate man and will do anything legal or illegal.

As a long time member, we cover all subjects not just panties. If this is how you plan to handle things, then I will leave PFM and stop recommneding it and Donna's Pantie business. Also take note of the heading, "Off Topioc."

-- Edited by pusspuss on Thursday 1st of November 2012 12:05:49 AM

I understand What you are saying but these are the only posts being submitted and think you might be intimidating some of the other forum members, I relize this is and open forum, so lets get some other posts going no one has posted anything in almost three weeks.

Howdy, Pee-Jay. I rather see that you'd kinda like to keep this Forum a Pantie Purist kind of thing. My personal Political, Religious, and Faith issues may be inviolable, irrevocable, but I think, that for now, that I can live with that. We have to brainstorm on ways to get PFM/FME/TUL running strong, once again.

How might other "off [pantie] topics" work, such as hobbies, avocations, recreation, tastes in the arts, and social situations work out? I think that a lot of that stuff could be germaine to helping pantiephreaks connect through other arenas in life, rather than just panties and lingeries alone.

I do like Donna's concept of, "The Underwear Lady", because we have to get some women/ladies/chicks used to the idea of guys enjoying panties, and also see just how many gals enjoy their undies, as much as us guys enjoy them. Finally, from the women/ladies/chicks out there, we need for a significant number of them to tell us that they're cool with the idea of guys enjoying soft undies, too, and like to play with guys, whilst both are wearing similar/identical fun garments. I'd sure like this pleasure of ours to eventually be viewed in an Omnisexual/Unisexual light.

Might you, Pee-Jay, be able to handle arguments from unenlightened chicks/women/ladies, that undies should be: viewed as utilitarian garments only; a matter of deep modesty; and that guys have no business touching female undergarments? As we try and persuade them otherwise, that sure could add some zing, some pizzazz, to this Forum!

panty john wrote:

---

I understand What you are saying but these are the only posts being submitted and think you might be intimidating some of the other forum members, I relize this is and open forum, so lets get some other posts going no one has posted anything in almost three weeks.

---

 No one has posted since PFM went down. Breeze and I tried to get things going, but I suspect that we lost most of the members. A lot  of people look at the posts but don't respond. I guess they just have nothing to say. The only thing being posted are in what are you wearing. I guess no one has an opinion on anything. Were not intimidating anyone. I think they all don't care for Obama.I wish we could get into some good civil discussions. They keep the blod flowing. There is more to life then just playing with ones self in a pair of panties. When you post in serial form, it keeps people coming back thge next day to see what's next.