You say you can't get her out of your mind? Why would you want to? I am hoping if I study these pix long enough, she will be stuck in my mind too!
Perhaps, using this rhetoric: "That's the point of this exercise." . . . Gee, golly, Betsy, that shouldn't take that much effort and study; that's the idea(Laughs!!)!
Well, as a belated Christmas Gift to you all, here's some more p-rickteasies from my current fave-babe at SheerioDotCom for you . . . Enjoy!!
Incidentally, be on the lookout, for a gi-normous Download Series of Vintage Catalog Pages over the weeks to cum. "Monkey" Wards, JCP, Sears, Lane Bryant; stuff like that, from the '50's-'70's. I've got hundreds of those pages to scan, so, please be patient.
It's really trippy how a chick who's arguably no more than in her mid-20's, can look so astonishing in antique/vintage lingerie and panties twice or more her age. Not a lame item amongst all of these pix that I've selected. Her pix are about the only ones that I'm downloading from SheerioDotCom. I wonder why??
Breezie, I like the photos, however we need to keep an eye on the nudity, as much as we all like like to some big ol' hooties, lets not get carried away "ok"?
Breezie, I like the photos, however we need to keep an eye on the nudity, as much as we all like like to some big ol' hooties, lets not get carried away "ok"?
Quick, where's the nudity? I always seem to miss the interesting parts.
Breezie, I like the photos, however we need to keep an eye on the nudity, as much as we all like like to some big ol' hooties, lets not get carried away "ok"?
Quick, where's the nudity? I always seem to miss the interesting parts.
Pee-Jay; it was not my intention to appeal to prurient, lewd, nor lascivious base instincts. This gal simply seems to want us to share in the sensuous celebration of lingerie in general, panties in particular. With respect to the maximal sheerness of her choice in panties, perhaps might the vaginal display underneath be a problem as well? We may have a fantasy about her, but, realistically speaking, she may have an intimidating boyfriend, husband, big brother, and-or father, and I can live with that, and, I doubt that she could be accepting of quite a lot of us at PFM, and commence affection, with anyone, except one very special and lucky man. Conceivably, we can do a lot of pretend here, while keeping a firm grasp on reality. If someone can't or won't do that, well, they have no business visiting the PFM Sites at all. Perhaps 95% of the pix of her that I've chosen of her, feature some extremely amazing vintage/antique panties, with exceptional Tricot properties, and, it seemed that she was particularly adept at showing them to their fullest advantage.
I'm sure that you've seen porn that's extremely silly, if not extremely nauseating, nor morally disturbing. There's also porn that tends to "bully" the viewer, by showing impossibly exaggerated "comic book" prowesses, and implying that you're a nothing, if you do not "measure" up, and that's what ought to concern you, 365/24/7. I know it's highly subjective, but, I see nothing of the sort in her pictures, nor her "sisters" at SheerioDotCom.
Might some of my pix collection of overly-sheer nightgowns also potentially cause problems?
I think that I've hung out at both the Old and New PFM, for nigh on Ten Years now, and, before the catastrophic crashes of the Old Sites, I used to see much racier stuff in the Galleries, back in the day. Very little of that material was intimidating, insulting, or forbidding. You might discuss that with Donna. Ask her about "Mr. Swirly-Head", in particular.
From what you and Donna may have knowledge about, could there be legal problems in my downloading and collecting these images, to want to share these here at PFM, as particular aspects, of our celebrations of lovely undies? I know that as I may attempt to download stuff to my HDD, if there are definite copyright stipulations on various and sundries, there will be an electronic block that prevents me from doing so.
Might you be seeing a trend as well, towards the Internet losing it's "anything goes" ways, presently, as opposed to 10-15 years ago? I sense that, and, I believe that PFM/FME does need some sort of protection, from those who can't or won't understand. Therein, lies a very strong paradox.
Breezie, The photo in question has been removed, and while I realize we posted much racier photos on the old site the domain host company does not allow us to post any nude photos, and if we do they can shut us down completely, so please obey there wishes so we can continue to share our stories and opinions on this FREE site.
The one that really revs my engine is the 8th pix in "part 3". Using my imagination, there's something about a pantied women with a shapely bootie being above me and coming down on my face that really gets me going.
__________________
I think a woman's pantied back side is the most beautiful thing in the whole world. Now if she'll just slap my face with it, I'll be her slave forever.
